Marketing has gotten really good at predicting customer behavior, but not necessarily at changing it. And that's surprising given that marketing at the end of the day is a causal language.
So let's unpack this a little bit. What is correlative thinking, or correlation, and what is causal thinking? And why are these disconnected? Most importantly, how can we solve for that disconnect and start with correlational thinking?
Correlational thinking
Correlational thinking, correlational prediction means what happens to this customer if we do not change the way we interact with that customer? If that customer lives under the dictatorship of the status quo.
We can already see that this is probably not what ultimately leads to growth.
Causal thinking
Causal thinking asks the other question. Causal thinking asks what happens to the outcome for this customer.
If we change a lever, for example, what happens to the outcome of that customer? If, instead of showing a generic product, we show a certain product when that customer comes to the site.
Why this matters
Now, why do these two feel disconnected?
They're disconnected because marketers have only had correlational predictions, predictions based on associations at their fingertips to make decisions.
Now, with the rise of AI, we are able to integrate causal thinking into how decisions are done.
And we call that causal decision making.
How causal thinking influences AI
If we want AI to drive growth, to cause growth, it needs more than associative patterns. It needs traces and evidence of causal effects. That is what we call causality data, and it is the key for marketers to achieve that growth thereafter with the help of artificial intelligence.